which of the following was not mentioned as a consequence of recent events involving police use of force?

• A. Body cameras for police
• B. Disarming local police officers
• C. Special prosecutors
• D. Citizen review boards

Answer: (B)

When we look at reforms that typically arise after police use-of-force incidents, the focus is on accountability, transparency, and civilian oversight. Body cameras are widely adopted because they provide an objective record of encounters, which helps determine what happened and builds public trust. Special prosecutors are used to ensure an impartial investigation into officer-involved cases, avoiding potential conflicts of interest. Citizen review boards offer civilian oversight, reviewing complaints and recommending changes to policies or practices. Disarming local police officers, on the other hand, is not a common reform that emerges from these events; the mainstream responses tend to emphasize accountability and oversight rather than removing officers’ ability to carry weapons. So that option is the one not typically mentioned as a consequence.